InvestorsHub Logo

VisionaryInc

09/20/17 6:53 PM

#53878 RE: silversmith #53877

I assume you mean a 2:1 split, I could see this occuring somewhere down the line but in the meantime to grow from this miniscule 8million dollar valuation, with 5 million in assets, we need to first utilize out additional shares for merger and acquisition opportunities as suggested by recent developments.

The additional assets will counteract the dilutive effects of additional shares by increasing our assets.

As we continue operations and grow organically, the remaining shares will be great to raise additional capital if needed for further expansion, additional printers, personnel, etc.

By the time all that is done, I would assume a majority of the newly added shares will be issued.

But at the same time, with increased assets, sales, and Shareholder equity, our valuation will be much higher than it is now, allowing current shareholders to avoid further dilution the next time they need to authorize more shares, and make room for a potential forward split.

GetRich1day

09/20/17 8:29 PM

#53879 RE: silversmith #53877

I agree with you Silver. SGLB has certainly not been kind to us LONGS over the years. I'm certainly not looking forward to another reduction in my percentage of ownership.

alanthill

09/20/17 8:58 PM

#53880 RE: silversmith #53877

I think Silver pretty much nailed it. Hard to think of much that SGLB management has done to earn the trust of shareholders. After being severely burned twice by unsuccessful dilutions what makes anyone believe this time will be different?

Putting yourself in the place of a company being acquired with a share-only deal think of the share premium you would insist upon to be acquired. SGLB is dealing from a position of severe weakness and any acquired company will make them pay dearly.