Replies to post #27624 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[madprophet]

A couple of glaring incorrect statements.

If Wifi one gets decided before CAFC decision? Okay, now Oral arguments were May 5th on WIfi One, CAFC decision usually reached within 6 months putting the decision on that due in by Nov 5th. WDDD WILL NOT EVEN HAVE HAD ORAL ARGUMENTS BEFORE NOV 5TH. So it will be pretty difficult to get a CAFC decision on WDDD before Wifi One.



CAFC decision will take about 6 months. Being as this will not be on calendar before the first week of Dec, that puts decision in about June.
BY all accounts and many sources, the Oil STates SCOTUS case will be decided June or before as the overwhelming majority of case get decided by SCOTUS before they take the break in June. So the below statement will be incorrect. Like saying BUngie will cross appeal (which was also incorrect and stated by Alpha) if you follow the timelines, this statement will also be proven incorrect.

Oil States is also important but the CAFC will rule here well in advance of Scotus ruling on that one next year

And finally if CAFC gives back claims or doesn't give back claims, this goes up as long as they make it through CAFC. That means we are on to district court, so yes in fact the stock. I still love the statements by you that say Susman and Godfrey will probably not represent WDDD in district court if they don't get claims back. Seeing as they have an agreement with WDDD, that one will amazing and I Will be happy to bow down to your expert analysis. Too funny This one is a little murkier, but the other 2 thoughts above, yeah those are WAY off.

[madprophet]

In regards to CAFC Judge Panel selection.

A safe assumption is that there are people who are waiting on the judge panel before increasing, decreasing, or starting a position.

3. Judge selection, if mayer or wallach, or both, or any anti patent judges are on the panel for this case it will hurt, risk goes up and you know 'patent swing trader' will dump more lol - you can google search for anti patent cafc judges to see who they are. That being said, if none of them are on the panel it would be a minor positive, but claim materiality still takes precedence and as I have said, the market is saying the remaining claims are not material given the share price.

4. Then finally, the ruling by the cafc - if they bring claims back, the stock and market will react positively, if nothing more and no change I doubt the stock will move much

If a selection of Judges as mentioned in above quote happens it is suggested that it will be a negative catalyst for PPS of WDDD, it then logically follows a Judge panel with 2 or 3 patent friendly or pro patent judges would have a positive effect on PPS. A patent friendly Judge Panel would also likely increase the chances of regaining some claims lost in PTAB.
So a bad panel "ït will hurt" and a good panel would be ä minor positive"? However there are people that are waiting on the judge selection before starting a position. I would suggest that a pro patent judge panel would be a major catalyst. As stated in the quote above, risk goes up- bad...again logically follows risk goes down---good.

[piratica]

AlphaInvestor8, thank you for your information, points well taken, there is a lot of uncertainties surrounding this stock. Perhaps it would be wise to stand by for a while.