Here's an email I sent. Was trying not to be too obvious I was pushing a stock I own. I'm sure they get stock pitches all day long and trash 110% of them.
We should follow the WIIFM principle: what do they get out of it? Why would they want to publish us? they never publish Nanos caps and they risk looking like the hokey, un-credible news sites that chase Penny stocks in doing so. So what's our value proposition to them? ...
Good afternoon.
I'm a student subscriber and avid reader of the WSJ. I've noticed an opportunity for comprehensive coverage of the surgical robotics field. With competition entering the market from the US and Canada, there's great potential for wealth creation beyond ISRG. There's a lot of publication focused on this online, but they are not necessarily accurate or reputable sources. I would love to see your team's assessment of the field and I'm sure the rest of your readers would benefit as well.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
Respectfully,
QuidWilson
And one I sent today, much less subtle...
Hello - In line with my original message below, this news came out yesterday and it has big implications as a next step for the competition against Intuitive Surgical (ISRG). I believe this is noteworthy and should get some recognition (Titan medical installs first single port robot for preclinical trials at Nicholson Florida Hospital). Analysts have begun to take notice as has a US mutual fund (Teton funds Mighty mites micro cap)...
(Link to marketwired.com story)
QuidWilson