bidrite, very simple you have the proof yourself without anyone needing to go spend time in the exercise. It is futile anyway because even with 5 double the companies NOT being in trouble I think we still want them gone because they now for a liability since they did NOT defend themselves and proof RONIN wrong.
K-Just look at RONIN's letters. It holds a list of companies that ES helped funding (penny stocks). I was not further involved (says RONIN themselves by not placing ES on any BoD of those companies).
Now look at the date. From the DECADE+ of business RONIN singled out 2010/2011 (the PEAK of the 2008 crisis where MANY companies got in trouble by the way). Where are those from 2005,6...13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ?
It was the JOB of a PPHM BoD member that is accused in such a manipulative way to AT LEAST out of respect of the shareholders who where the addressees of these letters and to take away ALL DOUBT and SPECULATION (look at yourself, would you have asked this question if there would have been a response letter with a valid explanation?) so that future negotiations with BP would not suffer a black cloud hanging there.
AIMO