InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Tekterra

08/30/17 2:22 PM

#20956 RE: TTTexas #20953

Here is a full report of the combined trials and history of Chemosat. They didn't get the FDA approval last time because the filter efficiency wasn't high enough and side effect was a problem. Now with generation two filters efficiency was up to 93% and side effects were manageable. They need a formal phase 3 to get the data for FDA approval. There is nothing that shows this isn't a viable treatment. Instead the reports all shows Chemosat was an effective treatment. The value of this treatment is there.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5126197/

"Toxicity data were reported in the noncomparative study by Vogl et al. [41]. Toxicities following CS-PHP were consistent with the toxicity profile seen in the clinical trials of CS-PHP with melphalan. The most common adverse effects were hematologic events (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia), which were managed effectively with supportive measures. Three patients were initially treated with the first-generation filter, then switched to the second-generation filter, providing an opportunity for a comparison of toxicity profiles with the two systems. Toxicity was less severe and patients required fewer supportive measures (i.e., no transfusions, shorter courses of colony stimulating factors) with the second-generation filter than the first-generation filter."