InvestorsHub Logo

22na22

08/29/17 12:54 PM

#26729 RE: DDobserver #26727

"ORDERED that Petitioner has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1 and 20 of the ’998 patent are unpatentable; FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 2, 3, 7, 8, 11–18, and 20 of the ’998 patent are unpatentable"

Still don't understand this. Is 20 killed?