Replies to post #26351 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[madprophet]

More info on that one.

""The two concurring judges could have made their view the opinion of a panel majority, but the court published it as a concurrence, which has no binding effect on other Federal Circuit panels or on the PTAB. The full Federal Circuit is set to rule within the next few months on the broader issue of parties’ ability to appeal issues that arise in PTAB decisions to institute trial in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp . The Supreme Court, in Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee , stated that PTAB “shenanigans” at the trial-institution stage are appealable, and the 12-member Federal Circuit is considering the boundaries of that term.""

https://www.bna.com/appeals-court-faults-n73014463487/

[AlphaInvestor8]

cool this is what you've said in the past I believe on Wallach and Mayer and 101 correct?

Judge Mayer and Wallach are who they are and their decisions in IP Law at the Appellate stand for all to see. Again these are IP Software patent decisions, both of which "improved a computer". In the Vringo case Mayer supplemented his "thoughts" in place of what the Expert found, Wallach agreed. The 3rd Judge, a former patent office attorney was shocked and astounded that Mayer could literally take the position of the Expert and supplant his ideas. This is not "fear-mongering" its fact, it happened and the larger CAFC refused to take it up. SCOTUS was too busy to bother. This is a very real, very serious threat that needs to be measured and considered. VirnetX was even worse.