I understand all the view points of those who think that such outcome may occur, however, why would the government release more documents, some even voluntarily lol, if its intention was to never give anything to the plaintiffs or anyone who's a shareholder? Why not just keep delaying or offer to settle and not release anything?
Point being, in a court case, be it the government or anyone else, if the defendants intention is to win the case and they're certain they will because they're rigging it, why would the defendants in such a situation voluntarily release evidence to the plaintiffs when they dont have too? Why create more criticism and doubt for their own?
Also it's not mentioned but, why are both the plaintiffs and governments on good terms with the same attorney? Lol this makes no sense.
If I was fighting a case and I hired a law firm, and the government who I was going to court with hired the same law firm or the head of It for different purpose lol? Isn't that conflict of interest?
In this context Jeff Sessions personal lawyer is the same person representing plaintiffs who are taking the defendants led by Jeff sessions to court?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
