Replies to post #26335 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[Go_War_Eagle]

I'm in agreement.

This, which StockAlphaDave's opinion was written on 12/23/2016- which is basically 2017. What I'm getting at is StockAlphaDave, who had a lot of good comments, was in agreement that Wallach now needs to have related precedents. Bottom line, I'm interpreting it that even if we do get Wallach, we still have a good chance of getting through CAFC:

"Wallach can not do what he wants he needs to back it up with related precedent and new precedents show a two part test is now required - odd that I have yet to see debate arguing my logic on the 558."