InvestorsHub Logo

vipergts758

08/22/17 12:11 PM

#14019 RE: mariosmack #14016

That's a required section of the 10Q. You're not fooling anyone.

ABBAZABBA

08/22/17 12:40 PM

#14025 RE: mariosmack #14016

First it was the REVENUE and now its the employees and contracts spin.

Can't stay on the revenues spin because those were just confirmed.

So I am curious mario, you speak like you have this all figured out. Answer this question related to your statement below:

You say "This actually happened. Eliasch did with Tempus what he did with every other company that he allegedly grew. He fired workers just to reduce spending and give the illusion that the company is doing better than it really is." OK now please Identify the "ACTUALLY HAPPENED BEFORE" part and be SPECIFIC.

I hope your not talking about the CEO of HEAD NV who is also the owner of $TMPS and Santiago Business Co. International ltd. https://www.head.com/us/about/biographies/

Because if you search HEAD NV without our BILLIONAIRE, you will not find the successful company you have today with the BILLIONAIRE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Eliasch

Cant wait for your response.

robtewms

08/22/17 1:02 PM

#14034 RE: mariosmack #14016

Good points. While an argument can be made of standard GAAP language (http://www.bakertilly.com/insights/going-concern-fasb-issues-new-standard-on-reporting-adverse-conditions/), the company can provide earning guidance to assist current and new investors to make decisions.

New CFOs, especially ones commissioned by shareholders with majority voting or company control, will squeeze every coin until it screams. A little dramatic, maybe.

In recent history, an NT 10Q and Offering notification was filed. There are many reasons to be late. Yet, there a fewer reasons for issuing Offering - Dilution: to fuel substantial cash burn and/ or debt service.

Take care in putting such trust in a "Billionaire" who has little or nothing to lose; now or in BK.