InvestorsHub Logo

holotawoopas

08/20/17 6:09 PM

#309271 RE: JJ1223 #309269

Here is what I surmise,

Ronin and company took a large position because they saw potential growth in Avid and a good prospective drug IP.

Ronin talked with management about how they are running the company and their near term plans for Avid and the IP.

Ronin did not think PPHM cared about creating shareholder value after talking to them, plus they saw the ATM sells going against it also.

Ronin then decided to put a pre thought out plan in motion to get a group of experienced people to set PPHM on a path for success.

Ronin then put out the letter to shareholders to explain why the COB must be changed and the culture that went with them.

So I see the context of the letter as an explanation of why the current BOD must go!!! not a denunciation of Avid or our IP!!!

nuf sed

bfiest

08/20/17 6:42 PM

#309273 RE: JJ1223 #309269

"If Ronin believed everything they said, they would have no interest in Peregrine."

And you come to that conclusion how? Do you have any facts or figures to back that up?

The Other Guy

08/20/17 9:11 PM

#309274 RE: JJ1223 #309269

Straight talk is what I am looking for.



And you side with the current BOD???