InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fbg0316

08/18/17 6:25 PM

#30408 RE: samk #30407

Not if they don't have the volume to cover.
icon url

ignatiusrielly35

08/18/17 6:25 PM

#30409 RE: samk #30407

Even the premise that Dan engaged in an illegal conspiracy which has been thwarted by his ouster is ridiculous, and lacks even a shred of evidence. FBG's disdain for him is not evidence. Moreover, it makes no sense. Do that for what? Illegal under the table cash? Please. Oh, wait, it was so the shorts would allow him to get share grants that were in line with industry norms. Despite the fact that the shorts had zero control over that. Oh wait, I forgot, the shorts had Tom Ridge in on the conspiracy, and he forced through the unspectacular bonus shares for Dan. Lol. What a complete fantasy.