Replies to post #88352 on Bots Inc (BTZI)

[BubbaInSC]

RFLMAO Wrong Conclusion

I believe that SEC will have to receive the information in a SEC filing; which obviously hasn't been reported.

"Street cred"? RFLMAO. That was the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

It's in the SEC correspondance, not me :)

Unethical business practices and bad unethical accounting practices are independent characteristics and don't necessarily go hand in hand.

Like Paris Group, why would they announce Paris Group as a new client - and then later - state they only "bidded" on the contract?

Nice try buddy!!

[BubbaInSC]

Not Looking Hard, eh?

Don't need an "accounting degree" or "street cred" to read :)

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1604906/000166225217000050/filename1.htm

Dear Mr. Mew:

Form 10-K for the Year Ended April 30, 2016 Statements of Cash Flow, page F-6
1. For fiscal 2016, you reported a financing cash inflow of $441,405 from the issuance of common stock. This appears to be a noncash transaction related to Stock Based Compensation expense that should not be reported as a financing activity. Please advise.

Answer:

The Company concurs with the SEC Staff and has corrected its Fiscal Year 2016 financial cash flow statement to the following below.

The Company kept that portion of the stock issuance of par value ($0.0001) for the stock issuance in the financing section under Issuance of common stock and removed any inference to cash. The remainder ($435,963) is accounted for under operating activities as “common stock issued for services”.

The Company believes it may address this change in the upcoming audit and Form 10K for FY2016 and FY2017 and that an amendment to the former Form 10-K is not warranted or required.

Yes, Additional Correspondence back to SEC - RFLMAO :)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1604906/000166225217000050/filename1.htm

after the SEC letter being sent to OMHE, if the SEC has neither received the requested information or insufficient information would have brought further action. Nope! Don't see any do you?
~Miro