InvestorsHub Logo

Replies to post #1354 on GG&G

Replies to #1354 on GG&G

art2426

08/15/17 1:18 PM

#1355 RE: Simpsonly #1354

>>>Oxford slowly gathered candidates, FDA wants 'something' light, nimble and quick to support FDA RWD and RWE on backs. Whelan showed his mettle in moving rapidly here to get that with a smaller back trial. The Oxford trial data can be used in the UK for the universal healthcare coverage addition under NHS . . . . . <<<



Got it Simpsonly, thanks! So it looks like they (FDA) are looking for just about anything to hang their hats on to go along with RWD as justification for clearance. Sounds about right to me because what the heck, WE all KNOW and THEY KNOW these products work great and should be on shelves in retail and available to ALL consumers in this country ----- YESTERDAY!!

Another positive from my using: Raked yard and mulch the other day, always gives me serious back pain at night and more so in morning getting out of bed. NOT this time after strapping the knee patch (2) on my back for serious pain at bedtime. Was able to stand EASILY and get up out of bed without grabbing bedpost. Funny how the knee patch works on my back, isn't it!!! C'mon FDA, we are not stupid, just clear the dang 'BACK' Patch for all muscle related ailments.

LOVE these products and

walker_429

08/15/17 3:32 PM

#1356 RE: Simpsonly #1354

If Whelan showed he was moving very rapidly, ( like a year ago ) would this be considered Heavy Mettle? ;)