InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

buckeyefan1971

08/14/17 11:20 AM

#13181 RE: claytont #13178

Great information claytont. As always much appreciated.
icon url

whizknock

08/14/17 11:21 AM

#13182 RE: claytont #13178

I believe you're 100% correct. I also believe the navy approached TMPS as to their interest in supplying this refueling service & that this has been in the works for more than a couple months!
icon url

Welican

08/14/17 11:28 AM

#13193 RE: claytont #13178

They are not purchasing six planes on just speculation of winning a contract...


A vendor would do the following:
1) See a request for bid and review the requirements that are detailed in the specifications

2) Locate a source for the equipment that you don't have that is needed to satisfy the bid requirements-(Locate but not purchase YET)

3) submit your bid

4)If your awarded the job, this is where you purchase the equipment you sourced in line 2 of this process...


So with that being said, they didn't just go out and buy 6 planes just for $heets and giggles... IMHO, there is plenty more to come in this story....
icon url

BillJay

08/14/17 11:52 AM

#13220 RE: claytont #13178

You make a very good and valid point.
icon url

LETSWIN2020

08/14/17 12:09 PM

#13229 RE: claytont #13178

Seems like QTRADER may have been right with his prediction that this will have a violent upward movement towards 5$ sometimes in the next few months . Your statement all adds up to what he predicted . Very interesting indeed .