InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

greenmachine2

08/13/17 10:51 AM

#20169 RE: MONQUE2 #20168

So you can see the potential dilemma for us shareholders if this happens with little or no stock in the treasury....



Let's say you're right:
In the least atractive situation calculating with an
O/S 404.78M * 84.9% = 343.6M - 206.43 (51%) = 137.22M dilution that's well within the 630M A/S.

The 51% is based upon the asumption that the company wants and needs a minimal majory stake of fysical share ownership. Otherwise is a publicly traced company not obligated to have shareholder meetings?
And if the amount of O/S exceeds the A/S wouldn't there for a SEC file publication been obligated?

IMO shareholders should be much more concerned if a company has a negative cashflow which can mean a bankruptcy filing over night then a surplus dilution of shares.

Because of the complete lack of financial info me and probably the majority of the shareholders take this dilution in acount. But if you mean that the full amount of 343.6M (89%) comes on top of the 404.78M (current O/S) then I have to disagree with you.

If a bussinessmodel and the execution of it are not well like with the Hydro Plant you get toxic lenders and infinite dilution but the current trucking company makes that a dilution of shares for the last 15 months or so aparantly wasn't necessary otherwise they would have.