InvestorsHub Logo

Suvorov

08/12/17 3:55 PM

#158532 RE: weasel6667 #158522

Last autumn when SRSR's legal team sent Currah a nasty letter Currah sent a voluminous swathe of information to SEC,FINRA and the IGEX auditor explaining how the deal was a fraudulent conveyance, one lawyer representing both sides, not satisfying the creditors, no shareholder vote/approval inter alia.

So the SEC, FINRA know all about Currah.

So what's left for jurisdictions to pin stripes on Evil Currah (1)? MI6, Mossad a rogue alien court near Saturn?

Footnotes:
1. Editors note: I find it quite perplexing as Currah is the only entity that currently curates the core, the pulps and the rejects, by paying the rent, taxes and insurance ; this archival core is the greatest asset SRSR possesses outside the property itself?
Very confounding.

es1

08/12/17 7:19 PM

#158548 RE: weasel6667 #158522

I don't think it's in other jurisdictions because there is no other court that has restricted his trading activity.

The OSC deals with ontario.
That is pretty clear.

Now all you would need to do is show where anyone restricted from being an officer or director of an issuer in Ontario was actually an officer or director of any Ontario issuer.

SRSR IS NOT an issuer in ontario.
So he would need to break a law in the USA. The SEC not the OSC would need to have a ruling against him.

He would need to break an SEC rule.

Which he very well could have.

However what ever rule he may have broken in the SEC it would not be punishable in ontario.

I don't see how a person breaking an american rule would go to jail in canada.
I don't see how you can break a Canadian law in america.

I could be wrong but I doubt it.
The agreements in question. (Like rent or fees) are owed in Ontario to a Canadian citizen. That is why it's a Canadian issue.
This is also why Scott isn't really involved. The things he may want to claim are business arrangements made between him and an american corporation while he was employed in an american company.
US law would need to determine anything Scott may sue for.

Tell me where I a mistaken.