InvestorsHub Logo

sweetlou

08/12/17 4:55 PM

#10278 RE: Jayyy #10275

You falsely and repeatedly state "COMPANY IS INSOLVENT" yet admit that "your own definition" of insolvent is different than Websters published definition. ROTH is paying its bills and you have no evidence otherwise.

This conforms to an ongoing pattern of falsely claiming a "verbatim excerpt" from a Consumer Reports article when the article in question was verifiably modified to remove the subject sentence and conceal the change with modifying the punctuation to falsely implicate ROTH and Sucanon in an FDA warning that in fact had nothing to do with the company or product. It is verifiable in post 4477 and many subsequent posts.

I will state further that if you can really prove anything at all that I have posted is factually incorrect then have at it. Aside from one factual mistake that was identified and immediately corrected, there are no errors of fact in my posts, because my information is verifiable from publicly available sources and cited in their entirety without modification