InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Easymoneyman00

08/12/17 12:07 PM

#29506 RE: fbg0316 #29503

Are you sure that protocol would have been in place and the hold was only 2 months?
icon url

Julius_Kelp

08/12/17 12:28 PM

#29511 RE: fbg0316 #29503

FBG following that logic, where was J&J's trial design input for ADRO?
ADRO's hold occurred approx 1 year after ADXS. Where there no lessons learned by ADRO and J&J from our hold?

The company is revising study protocols in accordance with feedback from the agency, including the modification of antibiotic administration following treatment, extended patient surveillance, and, as a pre-emptive measure, exclusion of patients who are on or will receive certain immune-suppressive treatments or who have certain prosthetic devices.


http://investors.aduro.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=242043&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2215034
icon url

ignatiusrielly35

08/12/17 3:53 PM

#29518 RE: fbg0316 #29503

David Mauro had a lack of experience running trials? And how exactly did DOC's greed cause the FDA hold?
icon url

mastiffsforlife

08/12/17 8:42 PM

#29521 RE: fbg0316 #29503

Doesn't matter who was running the trial. They would not have know to keep patients with implants out of the trial design. That's one of the reasons so many phases are run. So you can see what works and what doesn't. The only difference if BP was running the trial. The HOLD never would have lasted that long.