InvestorsHub Logo

cheynew

08/12/17 7:45 AM

#308098 RE: jakedogman1 #308094

A few new names in the II list for this Q:

Date Shared Held Change (Shares) Change (%) Value (in 1,000s)
ADVOCACY WEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC 06/30/2017 1 1 New
AIRAIN LTD 06/30/2017 42,362 42,362 New 148
BALLENTINE PARTNERS, LLC 06/30/2017 3,572 3,572 New 13
BANDERA PARTNERS LLC 06/30/2017 203,004 203,004 New 711
BROWN ADVISORY SECURITIES, LLC 03/31/2017 82,859 82,859 New 290
BURT WEALTH ADVISORS 06/30/2017 286 286 New 1
CONNOR, CLARK & LUNN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD. 03/31/2017 9,989 9,989 New 35
FOLGER NOLAN FLEMING DOUGLAS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC 06/30/2017 1,429 1,429 New 5
HUDSON VALLEY INVESTMENT ADVISORS INC /ADV 06/30/2017 16,900 16,900 New 59
MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC 03/31/2017 9,199 9,199 New 32
SEI INVESTMENTS CO 06/30/2017 80 80 New
SPARK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC 06/30/2017 18,372 18,372 New 64
TAPPAN STREET PARTNERS LLC 03/31/201 914,304 914,304 New 3,200
7

exwannabe

08/12/17 8:31 AM

#308103 RE: jakedogman1 #308094

A compromise certainly can not be ruled out. The two advantages are cost and good will.

I would like to see at least one member of the existing board get the boot though. Kind of like "somebody has got to go to jail" (from National Treasure). Either make the new board 1+2+2 or bring in a true outside replacement from neither camp. Or any such.

And of course further BOD pay cuts (past the court mandated reduction).