InvestorsHub Logo

cottonmather

08/08/17 10:59 AM

#105848 RE: diy_investor #105847

Thanks. I'll hit it tonight or in the morning.eom

cottonmather

08/09/17 6:42 AM

#105851 RE: diy_investor #105847

Simply more mmtc BS. It says pretty much nothing. And no mmtc mention. mit1000 faults remain uncorrected. It states no reality for mmtc.

As the sucker pool decreases investors learn how they have been duped by the mmtc scam and others. OTC scams are frequent. This silly synopsis is a good example of scamware - it is connected to mmtc but says nothing substantial and to the benefit of the stock or company or investor. In fact, this crap is largely a repeat of given news years ago, only in a different package.

What about it being in the AOAC journal? Most journals have a centerpiece contribution that is sought by that journal. Many of the other contributions are pay-for. I'd say this article is pay-for. Second, it discusses a science, not mmtc. The article is filler for the journal. It says nothing - painted air.

the mit1000 is a turd with several deficiencies that must be corrected to be a viable product. And I mean very serious deficiencies. haavig has worked on the mit1000 since 1998 and has yet corrected basic necessities for mere survival. Would you eat food tested knowing the accuracy was 30 to 50% correct? This is just a small portion of a terrible reality behind mmtc. mmtc STILL SUCKS