Replies to post #10188 on PharmaRoth Labs, Inc. (ROTH)

[sweetlou]

You falsely and repeatedly state "COMPANY IS INSOLVENT" yet admit that "your own definition" of insolvent is different than Websters published definition. ROTH is paying its bills and you have no evidence otherwise.

This conforms to an ongoing pattern of falsely claiming a "verbatim excerpt" from a Consumer Reports article when the article in question was verifiably modified to remove the subject sentence and conceal the change with modifying the punctuation to falsely implicate ROTH and Sucanon in an FDA warning that in fact had nothing to do with the company or product. It is verifiable in post 4477 and many subsequent posts.

I will state further that if you can really prove anything at all that I have posted is factually incorrect then have at it. Aside from one factual mistake that was identified and immediately corrected, there are no errors of fact in my posts, because my information is verifiable from publicly available sources and cited in their entirety without modification

[old biohf guy]

No Jayyy, if you are paying your bills then you are not insolvent by definition.

Now back to post #4477. You should read the Consumer Reports rules for modifying their articles and then posting on another site like iHub.

[old biohf guy]

You assume the reason for the website being down is lack of money, but this may not be the reason. If you took the time and effort to ask the company you might find out the actual reason.