Replies to post #14408 on RVUE Holdings Inc. (fka RVUE)

[xZx]

we've discussed this quite a lot before:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132821766

and more detail from the CEO here:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132920876

he makes it clear we own shares in the shell, just like roche.

i don't care about "proceeds" or a "distribution" as RVUE's assets are liquidated. roche paid about $416K for them, if i recall. his "roche enterprises" owns those assets.

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/rvue-holdings-inc-announces-sale-assets-secured-creditor-pending-liquidation-pinksheets-rvue-2223119.htm

the real value here is in the shell and what RR plans to do with it. and the CEO of RVUE is legally constrained in what he can say. if he's not part of RR's new venture, he cannot speak to it. but even if he were, reverse mergers happen in a quiet period.

[FUBAR]

Even when a company is no longer in business, there may still be active trading in its stock. This is because companies that are no longer operating may still have outstanding registered stock, which can be traded until the company has the shares deregistered or the stock's registration is revoked. The SEC does not have a rule that prohibits the trading of stock once a company becomes defunct because it does not want to forbid transactions between willing buyers and sellers, including those holding shares in defunct companies