InvestorsHub Logo

Blingsauces

08/02/17 1:15 PM

#39641 RE: dsaul #39639

Those facts are all positive yes I agree and they are a step in the right direction for sure...

However, FACT is they have no revenue, no revenue streams, and a commercially unproven product. And while I agree that their balance sheet will be better than in previous years/quarters it will still have a big fat ZERO in the revenue column until ground breaks with WNEC and a royalty is paid. So when certain people refer to an expected better balance sheet as being "smoke and mirrors" I completely understand their viewpoint...

And while I agree that there are positive tailwinds behind them from the Trump Admin the vast majority of the clean coal news I have seen is talking about carbon capture after burning the coal... Not pre-treating the coal prior to burning...

The window is quickly closing to begin construction on a plant anywhere in Wyoming in 2017...

I have not been able to find any announcements anywhere in Wyoming about applications for a plant(meaning building permits, zoning changes, rail access changes, or any offers/pending sales on sites that already have these built in... If someone can please post it

Cartman 3_16

08/03/17 1:29 PM

#39679 RE: dsaul #39639

Yes indeed! That is a huge question. LOL.

Here are some more facts:

1- $120,000 is an insignificant drop in the bucket compared with the money needed for operations and all "plans". Fact.

2- Shareholders foot the bill for the ridiculously exorbitant salary of a CFO/COO who isn't even a CPA, for a company that has no revenue. Fact.

Knowledge is definitely critical to wise UNEMOTIONAL investing decisions. As usual, folks should do their own DD.