InvestorsHub Logo

MD-420

08/02/17 7:45 AM

#88172 RE: lesgetrich #88171

That doesn't seem to be I the form of a question. You also haven't replied to my last post. Remember those cafs projections you were giving? It's a trend with the info you post.

bigballer_sa4

08/02/17 8:10 AM

#88174 RE: lesgetrich #88171

OMHE profit margin actually looks to be around the 20-25% range. The 1.6mill was a huge one time entry and that number really shouldn't be considered. Also, 1.6 mill was a net income number not profit number so you can't really use it to reverse engineer to Revenues when provided a profit margin.

BubbaInSC

08/02/17 11:55 AM

#88182 RE: lesgetrich #88171

RFLMAO No That Was A FAILED Projection re: OMHE

$80 mil pulled out of smelly parts. No real DD.

In re: payments, MCIG has already FAILED with Bitcoin AND Loans to "customers"

In addition, Master put it very nicely:

Live in two weeks is NOT live in a Production environment with an actual user base actively using it.

Rigorous testing just means that they tested it for a specific workflow and specific parameters, but once actual users hit the system, it does not mean that it actually works yet. Once actual users get involved and use the system they will see if the specific parameters tested along with the specific workflow scenarios that they tested for work or not. This is when the bugs will be found and they will know if the system actually works or not.

Who tested it? How many people were involved in the test?

The other parameter missing is the amount of active users hitting the system at the same time. Are the back end server resources enough for say 100 people hitting the pay system at the same time, 1000 people, or 10,000 people?

Psst, buddy! I am a Software Application Production Support Specialist in real life, you are just an expert blogger that is into creative writing for Paul Rosenberg that like to use the word "Conservatively" alot.