InvestorsHub Logo

Jamis1

07/31/17 12:05 PM

#58949 RE: QD explosion #58948

That statement means nothing. That's the polite way of saying we've both agreed to discontinue our service agreement. It points no fingers. You're reading it to fit your view point.

I believe the 8k also states that the auditing firm found no issues with their filings during their auditing period.

Jamis1

07/31/17 2:51 PM

#58954 RE: QD explosion #58948

Here's the part you decided to leave out of your post:


b. WEAVER’s report on the financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting.

c. Our Board of Directors participated in and approved the decision to change independent accountants. Through the period covered by the financial review of financial statements of the quarterly period ending March 31, 2017, there have been no disagreements with WEAVER on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of WEAVER, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements. Through the interim period July 27, 2017 (the date of dismissal of the former accountant), there have been no disagreements with WEAVER on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of WEAVER would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements.


https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315217008245/form8-k.htm

Clearly, they decided to part ways and Weaver stated there was nothing wrong with previous audited filings. You painted only a small portion of the full picture in your previous post. To what avail?