InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Protector

07/31/17 6:40 PM

#306420 RE: peregr #306259

pereg, think about it.

Also, didn't CP say nominating deadlines have already passed. It is illegal what they are attempting to do :)



Suppose it WOULD BE illegal then NONE of the candidates should pass BUT if they put there OWN candidates on the ticket then they can NEVER have legal problems.

Either Ronin's and their candidates are valid OR NON of BOTH are.

...OR....

they DID ask the Nomination Committee back in April to vet some candidates. We have seen when Ronin started to build it's position and Ronin spoke with PPHM. So they MIGHT have known what was coming and they KNOW the procedure.

But we must SPECULATE on this because we received NO information about that.

But unless the 3 candidates that they will propose are RONIN's candidates (which would mean PPHM takes on board people that are candidates from a party they publicly called ACTIVISTS) the this move is CHECK MATE or RONIN must propose 3 extra BoD members.


In ALL CASE: We are shareholders of something that apparent has sufficient VALUE and/or POTENTIAL to fight for!!!!

AIMO