With a minority ownership stake in BTC, how could there be a strangle on innovation?
If we owned 51% or it's clearly outlined in the Operating Agreement that GAHC dictates company operations, GAHC is nothing more than a shareholder of BTC, likely with basic voting rights, but not enough to "strangle" innovation...
That's a stretch...
I'm going to speculate that this is directed at the Feds, not their strategic business partner.