InvestorsHub Logo

rockland2u

07/16/17 6:29 PM

#33700 RE: oldnick #33699

and one of those cases was already ruled on once, it was without merit, 2 reasons, one the DOJ already approved merger, and made AA make adjustments and give up routes in order to increase competition story over, AND they want money they say they lost in increased fares when A> fares are competitive and haven't even kept up with inflation let alone gone up significantly, and they have know way of Proving how much they would have flown and how much those fares may have been. expect that ruling to stay the same. pilot ruling not have as much info on but assume company is fighting vigorously . most of the ruling went in the companies favor, because they settled the ones they new they couldn't win. let hope these cases end quickly now that it is only 2. ready for the last and final disbursement. i hope we are paid in shares too. don't want cash, at this point more shares

rockland2u

07/16/17 6:48 PM

#33701 RE: oldnick #33699

so hypothetically if the are 25M shares left, and there were 750M shares at time, that need paying, that equals 0.03333333 shares per unit, so if i original owned 14000 shares of AAMRQ then , times that .03333333 equals 466.66662 shares at 55.00 dollars a share should be 25,666.66 bucks. that would make a great christmas present and they should give it to us on the anniversary of the merger date in dec.