Replies to post #47331 on Demand Brands Inc. (DMAN)

[3DYOGI]

A lot of these companies growing and selling MJ have been bogged down with red tape and licensing and certification process. There is so much production and growing going on the price per pound has dropped drastically. The ad space is a lot simpler to implement and become profitable in. Hence I think Coleman makes more cannabis related asset purchases. And what he buys I have faith on past performance he will make a winner out of all future purchases. Content is King! He seems like he is laser like focus on the cannabis aspect of business I expect more updates acquisitions and updates soon. It's genius to launch at mjac2017.com and be a major sponsor of the event! Not to many OTC 6 straight quarters of revenue growth no debt no toxic financing INMG is a company with lean mean balance sheets and a competent CEO navigating the INMG ship with a lot of skin in the game closing in on 100 million shares about half the OS. ground floor opportunity for a real company on the OTC with keen cannabis exposure! And a large array of entertainment assets making money with high profit margins!


$INMG

[Elkay11]

Yes, having a grow op in the biggest rec market in the world, and likely the most expensive in the world likely helps.


Opening weekend of rec sales on the 1st of July in NV, and dispensaries were selling for double price, and people/tourists are willing to pay!
I'm long in the other stock.

I checked out INMG FB links posted yesterday, and I think the problem here is that there is no visibility here yet.
The Facebook page has 3 updated profile pics, no posts, and 22 followers ATM.

I would expect some content on the social media pages to draw attention to the stock.
I know it's a sponsor for MJAC, but right now they are just advertising that, and little is being done to raise the stock value.

In terms of their capital debt/loss, they get to carry that loss against the gains when tax man come a knocking. Earnings up and revenue up? (I'm not a financial specialist, but assumed one would equate to the other!? Correct me if I'm wrong)