Replies to post #302528 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[ststephensrevenge]

OH HE11 YES!!!!!

[ststephensrevenge]

Start packing your bags PPHM management.

Like the Rush 2112 song verse:

WE HAVE ASSUMED CONTROL
WE HAVE ASSUMED CONTROL
WE HAVE ASSUMED CONTROL!!!!!

GO RONIN, you are officially on my Christmas card list

Sleep well tonight King and Swartz.

[Protector]

The RONIN Mask falls off!

A good thing PPHM Bod doesn't give Ronin UP-FRONT info in private that WE would not equally have.

Both publicly and in our private conversations with management, we were shocked that neither Steven W. King nor Paul J. Lytle, Peregrine's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, could articulate any long-term strategy for addressing the capital needs of the Company, curing the outstanding going concern notice or rectifying the Company's corporate governance shortcomings, including the apparent interest misalignment of directors and other problems associated with Peregrine's Board of Directors (the "Board").

With this the mask falls off. Ronin want info in PRIVATE conversation, which is AGAINST US SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST because Ronin would ALWAYS be a step ahead on us.

Such party, with this TIMING (27th JUL CA hearing, Tomorrow Q/CC, and started building a position when PPHM needed to Use the ATM for the HALO/ROCHE and Avid III building) now tries to tell us that they are on OUR SIDE while they their first action is MISLEADING, IMO.

PPHM (CEO King+Lytle) CLEARLY gave a "long-term strategy for addressing the capital needs of the Company,", namely SUSTAINED PROFITABILITY in JUNE 2018.

That is even MID term in my book and SUSTAINED is the LONG TERM PART. They have clearly and PUBLICLY told us, less R&D cost by working with NCCN, MSK? etc and INCREASED REVENUE from Avid and partnering Exosomes.

WHAT MORE DOES RONIN WANT TO KNOW! How much is Ronin INVOLVED (possibly even driving) the Class Action.

Anyways, NOTHING HAPPENED with Bavituximab (no FDA approval) hence no need for an additional BoD (according the CA terms).

Doesn't mean that I wouldn't like to see a 5th BoD member, but now for sure NOT ONE PROPOSED BY RONIN (and for that matter also NOT ONE coming from ES - he has already two side-wheels in the BoD).

Why can we not have HALO's CEO on PPHM board. She is smart, just like Google on Apples Bod at the time, there is no competition (at this time). She has the address book, is not in ES nor Ronin's pocket and before all has performed well.

Question is: Is Roning doing an anti-Dart thing here, because if they are they will bite in the sand.

Why is Ronin interested in a company that HAS NOTHING (so said by some). Why all the energy to get access to PPHM/Avid? Is this part of a strategy for PPHM to accept offers from another party (kind of like if we accept the XZY offer then Ronin is out of the picture).

This starts to SMELL HOSTILE! But that is good because nobody EVER did something HOSTILE to get NOTHING!

[corporalagarn]

Wow! How great is that letter. And I thought I hated the BOD. If it lasts for more than four hours, seek medical attention.

[PGG76109]

How can we contact Ronin and show our support as shareholders?
This charade has lasted way too long.
PG

[TampaTradr]

That is the best thing I have read on this board in three years!