InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kruy

09/13/06 6:24 PM

#71431 RE: MHS #71365

My mistake, it was an .02(been a while) one time dividend that started the PTSC run. But other than that, many similarities here. (and the .02 V .01 isn't that dissimilar)

SLJB had mentioned a .0025 qtr dividend (.01 per year) to start off. Share structure almost identical to PTSC (500M O/S at time of PTSC dividend) versus 500M O/S for SLJB.
If audits are correct, we should have more earnings than PTSC and potentially vastly more future earnings, thus making any potential dividend for SLJB much more attractive to long term investors.

Bottom line, yes, PTSC and SLJB are different animals but the fundamental reasoning behind dividend are the same and will have the same effect on pps.

I agree with many here that dividend would be the ultimate death grip on shorts having to cover taking into account all the other positive potential developments with SLJB.