"or how will the company rise like a phoenix from the ashes under the guidance of current Mgmt (aka same guys from before for the most part) "
Being that this was the same "logic" that the 5 Stooges used before bankruptcy, after holding their shares for many years with losses, why is hoping for good things from the company not valid now, when it was the same "strategy" that the Stooges themselves had used with Implant for years? Holding a company with $90 million in debt, bleeding cash, and hoping for the best was fine, but hoping for good things from a new company is unwise? Please!
I could name (AND DID POINT OUT FOR YEARS) dozens of things wrong with IMSC, and yet shareholders still held. So now, there are potentially some issues with the new company, and those somehow we should fear, when the IMSC former HUGE issues, complete with company and auditor warnings, were nothing to worry about?
Hoping for the best was fine before, but is wrong now? Seems arbitrary!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
