Noe - your points are correct about what else Mc needs to do. I've been an investor since 2015, I've read the press releases, seen the presentations, scoured the articles, and the value proposition is lower cost, lower profile, clear FOV to surgical site for surgeon, 3D camera, smaller unit. It's indicated for broad smaller/Outpatient surgeries. The SP is only indicated for urological procedures but surgeons can use devices outside of manufacturers indications. Can the features of SPORT can best the SP? if anything they're very similar.
I'm like everyone else, I've got my eyes to the sky. I'd like things to pan out. but I've got a deeper doubt now that SP is seated to undermine the whole concept that made SPORT unique. Let me know where I'm wrong....I pray I am!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
