InvestorsHub Logo

Plowmaster

07/04/17 12:32 PM

#72320 RE: Steelyd3 #72319

A CEO simply can't state those words, it's pure legal disclaimer. No CEO can state it in any company without creating undue liability. Pretty much can't use the word 'never' in a future tense for any given business situation. It is as simple as that and nothing to focus on.

Have you read pretty much every OTC financials that automatically need to put a 'ongoing business concern' section in? Even if everything is looking awesome? Just the litigious nature of our system.

$BVTK$

absintheminded90210

07/04/17 12:47 PM

#72322 RE: Steelyd3 #72319

Has FINRA approved 3 RS in less than 24 months since they started denying such corporate actions in record numbers the last few years?

I think it's a minor worry here at least until next year no matter what tommy phd says.

lesnshawn

07/04/17 1:36 PM

#72353 RE: Steelyd3 #72319

Steely: If buying back shares is what they are thinking about, for various reasons, then I'd think at sometime they'd publicly hint that.

If, on the other hand, a buyback of shares, for various reasons, were not on the BOD's minds then we'd not read of it being hinted publicly.

They just hinted at it yesterday.

What do you think that tells ya/us?

What do they gain in doing a R/S? A reduction in O/S and a subsequent identical reflection of it in the share price. That's it. For the right reasons, good for the shareholder, but limited in its benefit. They lose out on the benefit of having any control of the reduced shares. They just go back into the A/S. At the same time, they also gain a lot of further distrust in its shareholders because many will never see an R/S as a good thing. Never. Very, very bad for the shareholder as a collective. It creates a sinking ship.

Bravatek's BOD is well aware of this.

What do they gain in conducting a share buyback program?

Quite the opposite.

Added benefit of having control of the bought-back shares...retire from A/S forever or put in their Treasury for future use and benefit. A benefit such as the 'funding' of an Employee Stock Option program. With 100 employees for just the sales side of the house planned in the next 18 months, they will want such a program in place, ASAP.

Another benefit in addition to the natural supply/demand rise in share price that will occur is the HUGE vote of confidence exhibited by the BOD in anticipation of the company's future growth with implementing such a move. And, implementing a share repurchase program ALWAYS reflects in a HUGE SURGE in retail CONFIDENCE corresponded by a SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE in buying pressure and subsequent HEALTHY RISE in magnitude of its stock price, per share.

Bravatek's BOD is well aware of this of this, too.

I have lots of trust and faith in, and confidence that, Bravatek's BOD will deliver what's of best benefit for not only the company's future but that of its common shareholders as well...of which, YTKG (consultants for Viking business arm) is one to the tune of a modest 10 million shares. They are one of us. That is how they got paid. Common shares...the ONLY way they directly got paid for their highly beneficial services. Therefore, I'd have to think 'Tommy Boy' wants to do good on the deal.

I look at it like this...If he's obviously so trusted by YTKG to accept that kind of deal and obviously so trusted by the U.S. Federal Gov't to employ him to oversee half a billion in its own investments in NWO capital of the world, Khazakstan, why in the world should a shareholder also not hold similar convictions of the man?

It would behoove a shareholder to not trust the words that the Hon., Dr. Thomas A. Cellucci, CEO of Bravatek, communicates to us. His words or those of the company he leads.

I trust him and I am patient.

lns

cjstocksup

07/04/17 3:21 PM

#72403 RE: Steelyd3 #72319

BVTK awesome tweet! "Benefit of long holiday weekend is that BVTK Board and management have time to discuss strategic options like uplift; buy-backs, etc..."
(Pretty sure the uplift was supposed to read up list)

TWITTER