Replies to post #40929 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[VVVVVV]

Well, the first letter was obviously read, with three new judges!! Can't argue that one. That's proof enough for me and I'd assume others.

Now will Trump and a few others read the latest? Somewhat doubtful but, the important one, is the one suggesting a rehearing of the decision to institute. Now, that would be HUGEEE!! It would only stand to reason that in order the make the patent owner whole with new judges, they would need to rehear the IPR Petition (s) Institutional Decision. One would think. Apple wouldn't like this and I'm sure they'd try to stop it, if applied.

Now, I'm not crazy about requesting all current and future IPR Petitions put on hold, until the decision on constitutionality. This just delays any offers another year or so.

IMHO

[DeerBalls]

Just curious, what proof of the letters having been read would satisfy you? A test of some kind? A declaration? Maybe Dr. Sawyer is really Emil in his Dr. Sawyer costume? No one has any proof of the letters having been read, any proof of them going out, nor any real proof of Dr. Sawyer, but my bet on all is in the affirmative. You may differ, if you choose!

[ketley]

Speaking of penny stock hustlers somebody asked if Kipping had attended court earlier in the week. Are you able to enlighten us?