Replies to post #535 on SurgePays Inc (SURG)

[shajandr]

READing is FUNdamental:

providing discounted and subsidized wireless (cell phone) and broadband service through both the Lifeline Program and the National Broadband Program.

Yes, True Wireless getts munny from the crooked Obamaphone Lifeline Program and that includes the Broadband internet service.

That's what it says.

Majorly WronGGG Stuff to claim it doesn't - they even admit it right in the text you cited!

Oh, and the GAO report is for both the Lifeline Program AND the broadband program

This low-cost phone and Internet program wastes millions in federal funding, auditors say

(Washington Post) - A federal program designed to help millions of low-income Americans afford phone and Internet service is riddled with fraud and abuse, with at least $137 million a year going to ineligible, fake or dead people, according to government auditors.

The explosive report Thursday from the Government Accountability Office shows that despite efforts to rein in abuse of the sprawling Lifeline program, which serves 12.3 million subscribers on Medicaid, food stamps or other benefits, many recipients of the $9.25-a-month credit are violating program rules.

Established during the Reagan administration, Lifeline is aimed at closing the digital divide between those with access to vital communications services and those without. Altogether, Lifeline distributes about $1.5 billion a year in subsidies.

It is funded by fees that are added to every consumer's monthly phone bill, and was expanded in 2016 — allowing beneficiaries to spend their monthly credits not only on traditional landline phone service, as they have done for decades, but also on residential Internet and mobile broadband.

The changes — which were proposed and approved by the Federal Communications Commission — reflect the Internet's growing importance to Americans as a way to find jobs, do homework and create economic opportunities for themselves.

For years, however, Lifeline has come under bipartisan criticism over its handling of benefits. Thursday's report, commissioned by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), appears to underscore those problems. GAO's study of 46 states and the District of Columbia found that 1.2 million subscribers could not be confirmed as being eligible for Lifeline benefits — out of 3.5 million accounts analyzed by the agency. It is unclear how many ineligible subscribers may be in the remaining pool of 8.9 million subscribers GAO did not study.

By analyzing Lifeline's database and also matching it against Social Security Administration records, GAO found 5,500 duplicate beneficiaries, as well as 5,400 who had actually been dead for more than a year. These individuals accounted for roughly $1.2 million of wasted funds every year, according to GAO estimates.

In Georgia and Michigan, auditors discovered that roughly half of all Lifeline recipients who had signed up for the program via Medicaid or food stamps — which are known officially as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — had questionable eligibility for discount phone and Internet service.

When government auditors posed as Lifeline applicants, approaching as many as 19 telecom carriers with false personal information, a dozen of the requests were approved, indicating that the companies — who are responsible for verifying a potential customer's eligibility — were not reliably screening out fraudulent applicants.

The FCC has called for the creation of a national third-party verifier to relieve phone companies of that obligation. So far, however, that proposal remains in its early stages of implementation, and the GAO report questioned the feasibility of carrying it out.

Despite the program's flaws, many Americans who are eligible for Lifeline are not signed up for it, according to federal statistics.

“A big problem with Lifeline is how relatively few eligible people actually take advantage of it,” said Brent Skorup, a research fellow at George Mason University's Mercatus Center. “In my view, of the four programs, it's probably the best one; many on the right favor a voucherlike system for universal service and low-income programs.”

Consumer groups called for shoring up support for Lifeline in the wake of the GAO report.

"Lifeline continues to be the only government program that helps low-income Americans afford phone and Internet service — essential for gaining employment, learning, expressing our views, staying in contact and keeping informed," said Carmen Scurato, policy director at the National Hispanic Media Coalition.

Others feared the report could become politicized.

"Some may use the limited findings of this report as justification to cut back on the Lifeline program even further, but that would be catastrophic for those most in need," said Mignon Clyburn, an FCC Democrat.

Still, FCC officials largely agreed with the report's findings, and the agency's chairman, Ajit Pai, said it upholds an investigation into Lifeline he led last year.

“Today’s GAO report confirms what we discovered then: Waste, fraud, and abuse are all too prevalent in the program,” said Pai in a statement. “I stand ready to work with my colleagues to crack down on the unscrupulous providers that abuse the program so that the dollars we spend support affordable, high-speed broadband Internet access for our nation’s poorest families.” (Bummer for True Wireless!)

Earlier this year, Pai took steps to prevent a number of telecom providers from selling service to Lifeline applicants. And, he said Thursday in his statement, his agency is developing further recommendations to enhance the program. (Bummer for True Wireless!)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/06/29/critics-say-this-low-cost-phone-and-internet-program-is-riddled-with-waste-and-abuse-theyre-right/?utm_term=.8cb5e170f82d

FCC's Lifeline program has 'massive fraud,' watchdog says
Mike Snider , USA TODAY Published 12:46 p.m. ET June 29, 2017 | Updated 6:46 p.m. ET June 29, 2017

A new GAO report found massive fraud within the Federal Communications Commission's Lifeline program, which subsidizes cellular and broadband service for low-income Americans.

The agency's three-year audit of the Lifeline program, begun in June 2014 to May 2017, found that more than one-third (36%) of Lifeline customers could not be confirmed as actually eligible for the program. The GAO also found that $1.2 million annually went to fictitious identities or recipients who were dead.

In undercover tests, the GAO found that phone companies approved Lifeline applicants with false personal information nearly two-thirds of the time (63%).

“A complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer—everything that could go wrong is going wrong,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., in a statement released with the report Thursday. “We’re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply can’t continue.”

Two years ago, in a separate report, the GAO recommended the FCC evaluate the Lifeline program. Last year, the FCC did approve a plan for a third-party evaluation by December 2020.

As part of that Lifeline modernization measure, the FCC also approved Lifeline funds be used for mobile and fixed broadband service. When it was created three decades ago, Lifeline provided assistance for low-income homes to get landline telephone service.

According to the GAO's new report, Lifeline households numbered 12.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2016, with disbursements of about $1.5 billion.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican, said the GAO's findings confirm weaknesses he voiced concerns about last year during discussion about modernizing Lifeline. "Commission staff and the Office of Inspector General have already been developing recommendations to better safeguard taxpayer funds," he said in a statement. "I stand ready to work with my colleagues to crack down on the unscrupulous providers that abuse the program so that the dollars we spend support affordable, high-speed broadband Internet access for our nation’s poorest families.”

Earlier this year, Pai blocked the approval of nine companies from joining Lifeline.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/06/29/fccs-lifeline-program-has-massive-fraud/439161001/

Whoops-oops!!! The fraud includes fixed broadband, as well as cell phones!!!

READing is FUNdamental!!! Majorly WronGGG Stuff

The good news is that ZERO Akyumen phones are involved

[xvx77]

Agreed. I am a KSIX fan. This a high growth revenue company in telecommunications and blockchain mobile wallets.

I have also been a shareholder since 2015, prior to True Wireless.
The True Wireless merger is amazing.

The last press announced that Brian Cox is CEO.
Thats major. KSIX reported $3.0 million revenue last year.
True wireless report $1.1 million a month and 5%-6% monthly growth.
That will be a combined $16 to $17 million revenue company.

This will be the only OTC stock I own in a company actually making money.

As a regulated ETC Company True Wireless complies with FCC and now SEC guidelines.

In the August 3 press release, Mr. Cox stated he was bringing in all-stars to KSIX.
In the July 24, press Mr. Cox stated short term goal was to build revenue to $2.0 million per month.
He stated that he was bringing "mobile wallets" and blockchain technology to KSIX and True Wireless.

If you do your homework, you will realize that True wireless is not only one of the most successful Lifeline providers but also a licensed ETC to provide mobile services throughout the United States.

In the May 23, press Mr. Cox stated "we are rolling out wi-fi offload software on our smartphones to cut carrier costs by 30%-40% and simultaneously pushing forward our branded prepaid wireless offerings Contigo Movil, serving hispanics, and Heart Mobile uniquely serving people with disabilities and elderly, by EOY 2017".

Prior press announced how KSIX digital marketing was a hand and glove fit to True Wireless dramatically lowering customer acquisition costs and increasing top line revenue. With the merger transaction it seems highly likely KSIX is the marketing machine for new product launches and potential acquisitions as stated in the press.

True wireless current generates $14 million in just 5 states. What happens when you launch 5 more states or 25, or two niche national services. Is that $50 million in revenue or $100 million?

Personally, I plan on sticking around to find out.

Thank you Madhatter for trying to state the facts! Ill try to help.