Replies to post #113580 on Sino Agro Food Inc (fka SIAF)

[RealDutch]

there is no wonder that you would see such a spirited defense of any IR work here from her.

Yes, and her criticism was justified, IMO. Empty's posts can be repetitive and boring.

Peter has asked management for guidance for as long as I can remember. They don't listen. Chad was frustrated like hell, when working with Solomon. And it's much the same for Peter or anyone else I guess.

There is not much they can do. Management has to deliver. Period!
Stop talking, and start executing.

Actually some of the comments from Peter in press release were on the edge already, perhaps even crossing the line. And you guys want even more "spin". I consider Peter the master of "spin" already. Not necessarily in a negative way. But I don't think it's helping. They need to be factual and to the point. Less is more.

[melehuna]

Yes, I have a relationship with IR. But I am not IR. My opinions do not reflect those of IR -- NOT ONE BIT.

In fact, when Bertil Tiusanen was with the company, he tried to prohibit me from posting because my views DO NOT REPRESENT THOSE OF SIAF.

I have NEVER signed anything on iHub with Peter Grossman's name, nor have I ever claimed to represent the company. That is an absolute and UTTER lie.

I have visited SIAF in China as an independent shareholder several times since 2011. I own, independently of Peter Grossman, more shares than emptyone. I have an independent shareholder relationship with quite a few SIAF employees or representatives.

I do not speak for IR. I speak with knowledge of SEC regulations.

On the other hand, I have invested the time and energy and money to learn deeply about SIAF, and in particular about doing business in China.

[melehuna]

there is no wonder that you would see such a spirited defense of any IR work here from her.

This is the most risible comment of all. "Spirited defense!" Ha ha, truly funny!

I wasn't defending IR. I was pointing out that empty's repetitive and valueless comments do not solve anything. IR can't solve SIAF's problems, unfortunately.

I was not defending IR. I was commenting about emptyone's ceaseless, unchanging comments. His posts remind me of sitting in a pub with the regular drunk who repeats the same trite recitation of nothing new every single night.

Perhaps someone will be able to convince Solomon to approve the necessary communications that could help to stabilize the share price. No one inside the company -- despite continual efforts -- has succeeded in persuading Solomon. Perhaps shareholders can communicate directly with Solomon and achieve some new success.

I am actually able to mount a spirited defense, should I choose to do so. Calling what I said in my earlier posts "spirited defense" is truly pathetic.