Ah pears, as always your agenda speaks volumes while your posts lack facts. Nothing new there. First, the science behind PRP-140 is in no way similar to HAART, thus the term disruptive. I would suggest you begin with side effects, compliance, and resistance to name a few. As for your speculative timeline and valuation, again better to use factual information versus misguided speculation. Please do explain your position with the support of facts, as I am sure everyone would enjoy that. If HAART is perfect, wouldn't everyone be on it? This is about the patients, you should do some research on what HAART does to them...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
