InvestorsHub Logo

allinone

09/12/06 8:56 AM

#69632 RE: waltczyk #69625

Walt, I am sure some shares may of been covered buy the shorts go off history of pink sheet stocks. Many pinks say they are making money, they are filing financials, they are growing etc etc etc all to be just lies, so they do not have to cover. What the shorts are betting on is SLJB is the same and filings will not be made. They have no reason right now to cover because yesterday was the same as last week with NO filings. Until the filings come out they will continue with their bet of no filings and all the revenue numbers is just BS. Well you are right, we are all about to find out. Our bet, the company is telling the truth, their bet, the company is just like the rest of the pink sheet stocks, scams! The OK CORRAL, standoff for right now!

sawtrader

09/12/06 9:01 AM

#69638 RE: waltczyk #69625

Walt, imo, I do not feel naked shorts are obligated to cover, since the lenders/brokerages themselves are in a soup for doing so. SEC does not want a scandal, nor do the lenders/brokerages want to get involved in a sling fest and lawsuits with hedgies. Hedgies will stall and win. Most probably lenders and brokrages will strongarm a few retail shorters to cover and if they get some to cover fine.

vixpix

09/12/06 9:04 AM

#69640 RE: waltczyk #69625

Walt....you have mail, eom.