Don't know the purpose of dwelling in the past. Except if the past is unresolved or can be leveraged for the benefit of the shareholders. As I remember the lunar rover demonstrated the company's engineering prowess, but the government cancelled the entire lunar project for budgetary reasons. The rover itself was an achievement, including the company's contribution. Am I correct? And about Darpa, wasn't there a claim that the management team the company hired at the time was either negligent or worse in preparing for the Darpa test? The Gleasmans had abdicated command and brought in the hires for their purported professional talent...in support of the company. I believe that's been discussed on this board extensively. Can you corroborate this? If not, please correct my interpretation. Lastly, I don't know anything about cartoon contests, so .....the end.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
