1997... Friendofbmk
I see that the date was not on the article.
This does not refute or condone anything in the article; I see no follow-up so one does not know the outcome, but it does put the piece in the proper time frame,
Over 10 years ago...
One reading "In March", might think it was recent without checking any further.
Without a year stated, it reads as a current happening.
Were there any convictions, sanctions, or reprimands due to whatever is being dragged over the coals in this article?
I didn't see any links or bylines (along with the date).