>>>As for ever seeing a Special Counsel appointed to look into EVERYTHING connected with the events of 911 and thereafter, good luck.<<<
The closest thing to an investigation so far has lost some luster too now that the co-chairman admits he's just another blockhead Bush republican. How about this pronouncement from Kean describing the rightwing propaganda piece of trash he helped produce.
"KEAN: Yeah. This is not a 9/11 Commission Report and this series is based on a lot of other things besides that report. It's a miniseries. It's not a product of ABC News. It's not a product of a documentary. It's very different. And it says right up front with a disclaimer exactly what it is. Nobody should have any doubt about that.
KEAN: Well, I think it's a very powerful production and one that's going to move the ball forward. I think when people see the whole thing - and a lot of people that are talking now haven't seen it. I haven't even seen the final cut -- they're going to find something where they learn more about the hijackers, more about the plot, more about the ways they tried to deceive the United States government, more about al Qaeda and hopefully in understanding that, they'll understand why it's so important that more of our recommendations get implemented by the United States Congress and the administration to make the people safer."
It's not a documentary and it's not news but it's part fiction and people should watch and learn. Excuse me but if it's part fiction and part documentary, how am I supposed to know which part to dismiss as entertainment and which part to learn from? And why not insist that ALL of it is factual if it's important that people learn?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
