Replies to post #31764 on EVIO Inc (EVIO)

[Magnum7419]

In reading further there is a glimmer of hope IMHO.........

SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution for
certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
district because in that regard this act creates a new crime or
infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the
Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the
meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution.
In addition, no reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution for other
costs mandated by the state because this act includes additional
revenue that is specifically intended to fund the costs of the state
mandate in an amount sufficient to fund the cost of the state
mandate, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.

ftp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bill/sen/sb_0401-0450/sb_420_bill_20031012_chaptered.html

[SierraPacificRising]

They will not need to , CA is the cannabis sleeping giant waiting to be let off its leash . It will be financed by billionaires and absolutely dominate the cannabis industry if allowed too .