he married into that. he met his wife at an environmental event. he has a brain and could articulate his ideas intelligently. he experienced war first hand. Believe me, he wasn't my first choice but given the choice of Bush vs. Kerry I would vote for him again.
So Kerry is a radical who accidentally married into the Heinz Billions?
Care to explain why a mere week after the election Kerry "switched" and supported Bush's position in Iraq?? He did so on Nation wide T.V.
Nader just wasn't viable.
You believing that is what makes it so. When Americans choose to believe in opinion polls instead of voting for what is right the have given up on Democracy. That is exactly what happened last election.
had Nader even gotten %5 of the vote he would be in the next presidential debates. That would have been a huge victory in itself. People seem blind to that. Most people who voted for Kerry actually seem glad that Nader wont be in the next presidential debates. Bush and Nader not in the denates is better than Bush without Nader in the debates. Whats up with that?
And finally, although you call Kerry a pro war candidate because of how you feel about his stance on things, I doubt that Chomsky or many of the rest of us who voted for him saw him that way... I know I didn't.
Not just me.
Me and MOST OF THE REST OF THE WORLD.
Again I find it most interesting that when the majority of the world was against Bush invading Iraq, the same people who apologize for Kerry now screamed that the majority of the world having an opinion against the invasion meant something. Now that the majority or the world sees Kerrycrats as apologists for pro war policies Kerrycrats think that means nothing.
Kerrycrats were dragged into their position of supporting the war in a very different way than the Bushies but in the end, Bushies vote for war and Kerrycrats do the same. Go figure
JMO, we can agree to disagree.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
