InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kfcyahoo

05/26/17 5:29 PM

#27409 RE: AngeloFoca #27408

Agree. His(her?) argument is that IPCI's Rexista w blue dye#1 will kill more people than Purdue's Oxycontin ALREADY has, and at a higher mortality rate.

I highly doubt it, he(she) either has some other agenda, or does not grasp the concept of preventive maintenance.
icon url

Samsa

05/26/17 6:49 PM

#27412 RE: AngeloFoca #27408

Angelo....agreed! Clearly it is being ignored that the FDA has been in contact with the company throughout this entire process and held an IND and other meetings and never once felt it was an issue.
icon url

WeeZuhl

05/28/17 9:59 PM

#27431 RE: AngeloFoca #27408

Very, very WRONG.




Can we stop with the blue dye crap already - just ignore him and he will go away.

Safety issues are resolved in Phase 1... not thereafter.

If the blue dye was an issue... the FDA would have never let IPCI continue down a dead end.








Please let me know if there are other informations gaps I can help you fill.





http://www.pharmacytimes.com/news/drug-safety-concerns-often-noted-after-receiving-fda-approval-


Drug Safety Concerns Often Noted After Receiving FDA Approval
MAY 12, 2017

Lauren Santye, Assistant Editor
Postmarket safety events occurred in 1 of 3 FDA-approved drugs between 2001 and 2010, according to a study published in JAMA.

The investigators sought to characterize the frequency of postmarket safety events among novel therapeutics approved by the FDA, and to examine whether any novel therapeutic characteristics known at the time of approval were associated with an increased safety risk.

Postmarket safety events were defined as a withdrawal from the market due to safety concerns, a boxed warning, or an FDA issuance of a safety communication. Of the 222 novel therapeutic drugs approved between 2001 and 2010, three were withdrawn from the market over an average follow-up of 11.7 years, 61 drugs received boxed warnings, and 59 were issued safety communications.

“The fact that so many new safety risks are being identified after FDA approval indicates that the FDA is taking its responsibility of ensuring the safety of new drugs throughout their lifetime seriously,” said lead author Nicholas Downing, MD. “However, these safety risks emerge, on average, 4 years after approval. This means that many patients are exposed to these medications before the risks become clear.”

Overall, postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent among biologics, psychiatric therapeutics, drugs that received accelerated approval, and those with near-regulatory deadline approval.

Drugs with regulatory review times less than 200 days had significantly less frequent safety events.

“This analysis highlights that there is residual uncertainty about the risks and benefits of new drugs at the time of approval, thereby demonstrating the need for all stakeholders engaged in the drug development process to commit to the generation of clinically useful information both before and after regulatory approval,” Downing said.

Reference
Downing NS, Shah ND, Aminawung JA, et al. Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010. JAMA. 2017;317(18):1854-1863. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.5150