InvestorsHub Logo

es1

05/24/17 11:29 AM

#156194 RE: Evil Rabbit #156191

Not real hard to understand.
Like I said Scott took the company from .008 at his start and brought it up to .025 when he left.

He improved the shareholder value so he fulfilled his "duty"

Dan takes over and the pps falls into the trips as a low and has remained sub penny.
His leadership has lost shareholder value.

I am sure Scotts actions were a big help to the dropping pps but the CEO is where the buck stops.

Scott didn't tell us they had all the money they needed for a resource estimate.
Scott didn't drill in the wrong place.
Scott didn't set up this deal and not follow through.
Scott did not promise a new era of transparency then not give it.

These things are Dans fault and the above arguement from a good lawyer is a win for Scott.