Replies to post #413516 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Sogo]

Thanks for the reminder. It seems like a very very simple case. Is it really gonna have a jury, then?

After listening to the plaintiffs' super high powered lawyers try (pathetically) to argue the accounting points to idiot judges ginsberg, millet (that was the name wasn't it?), who equally pathetically couldn't grasp them, i unfortunately now have zero confidence that any lawyer can explain even this simple problem with paying 100% dividends to a single class and Zero to another that is at the center of the DE case.

But the DE case is just so...plain...obvious. What will go wrong? Will some scotus judge start spouting off and demand the case be stopped and sent directly to scotus? Will something weird like that happen? Will some Fed appeals judge say DE is not the "controlling legal authority" or something?

[Donotunderstand]

Navy

Why would the HERA judicial restriction not apply

All the cases had different interesting solid angles for argument

All the GOV has done over and over is point to that ugly HERA clause and ask for a motion to dismiss

And each time (other than Sweeny) the motion to dismiss has prevailed and we never get to argue the case

Why would this solid angle and solid argument ever get heard and not get dismissed by a GOV motion to dismiss (which is what the GOV has motioned !!)

??

[tennis3131]

Delaware case is solely based on GOVT blatantly violating.

SO WHY THE HELL IS IT TAKING SO LONG TO MAKE THE JUDGMENT IF IT IS SO DAMN SIMPLE.

DELAWARE IS SOOOO FRUSTRATING. TALK ABOUT NOT DELIVERING ON OUR EXPECTATIONS.

IT HAS BEEN WELL OVER 1.5 YEARS. WHAT THE HELL?