InvestorsHub Logo

Stanner

05/23/17 4:42 AM

#9400 RE: littlejohn #9399

CSOC~totally by me LJ',I had to hire accountants to do everything money_&_paperwork wise,so I don't know. What I see is, its' done and Richard and Anna are now in control.The 'float' is legitimate and ownership is legitimate.

My question was can we go to court to get those two things dropped. His reply was amazing to me personally.Very matter of fact as to what was done and where things stand. ""Whats' the Story""_NOT_what the story should be.

For me now its' on to legislation DD.I have to ask Richard once more for what to look for.--I'm thinking there may already be Bills pending that address records keeping/tracking/tech stuff as it relates to MJ'.WOULDN'T THAT BE HOT_!$$$!_so I'm pursuing that to see where things are. It would be great if all I and others had to do was call our reps' and ask them to support Bill so_&_so for MJ' accountability.GO_CSOC_!$$$!_

Stanner

05/23/17 6:07 AM

#9401 RE: littlejohn #9399

CSOC~delicate matter.CSOC has a CFO.Were Richards' money outlays' unnecessary_?_Your DD kind of points to exactly ......._?_(what are you saying that I can understand.)

Should there be follow up based on your DD. Should Richard_&_Anna be made aware of your DD.

From my very brief time here ,there have been postings where the CFO has been called into question pertaining to other tickers.Should your DD be Emailed to Richard_?_