Not only was it mentioned at the shm but the lawyer also got up to interrupt the meeting at one point to ensure that everyone was clear that voting would continue until the end of the month and also to be sure that the minutes reflected this as well. He then proceeded to give an update as to where the vote stood after everyone in the room had voted. He was required to still check with brokers and such.
The reason LTs post threw you was that is was a very good piece of writing with cognitive thoughts and a specific sense of clarity. That is just something you may. It be used to reading....
You could easily confuse it with a comment about why do they not have an auditor - which a funny question as it was incorrect. What the company announced last week was the independent or external auditor required by Sarbanes OxLey, and certain portions of the 33 act for validation purposes. What the poster failed to recognize was that the company t had an internal auditor already. It seemed useless to point that out at the time because walls are for blocking not talking.
So I expect that the financials are underway. It is obviously very recognized and necessary for any real future activities.
And as I pointed out to one shareholder who pushed back on the use of FIDO as a broker, they actually hold a huge percentage of the retirement assets of Americans and perform the 401k work for many as well. Simply put - simple people like one stop shopping. So they will lot. E moving assets. The next step of this company relies solely on the financials and their completion. My vote is very confident that this will complete very soon. I get the sense that the IA who was at the meeting has a very good idea what he is engaged in and a good handle on the activities impacting the K and Qs.
The company is really making kings happen
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
